Buna ziua,
CP este totusi un monument reprezentativ pentru Bucuresti, pentru
istoria prin care a trecut orasul si tara si este admirat de vizitatori (chiar
daca unii vizitatori auzind si cuvintele de ocara multe nejustificate si
exagerate- la adresa aspectului cladirii ale unor roamni, o privesc si din
perspectiva asta).
Fiind o cladire reprezentativa ea trebuie sa ramana sediul organului
reprezentativ suprem, adica Parlamentul....
In nici un caz nu trebuie copaci foarte inalti in apropiere sau
inconjurata cu copaci ianalti care ar putea reduce din vizibilitatea ei.
Coniferele de pe diagonala sunt in regula pentru ca ele ajuta la aspect,
inclusiv fotografii. Dupa finalizarea in zona actualmente virana a Catedralei
se va putea face o legatura arhitecturala mai coerenta intre zonele cu
potential de acces pietonal: parcul Izvor, eventual zona din fata CP (o
gradina), zona de langa Academie (o gradina), si Catedrala.
Pana tunci propunerile mele sunt:
-gardul ar trebui sa fie si pe celeleate laturi tot dupa modelul celui
din fata, adica partea de jos beton, iar partea superioara din fier forjat.
Este si mai aspectuos si ai o vizibilitate mai buna. Acum daca mergi pe langa
gardul de pe latura cu Academia nu poti sa vezi CP de ditamai gardul;
-transformarea partii din fata (poate si partea dinspre Academie) in
gradina publica pana la limita superioara a planului inclinat. Ar ramane astfel
o zona protectie/securitate pana la intrarea din fata in CP de aproximativ 100
m, zona in care accesul nu ar mai fi public. In acea gradina publica se vor
putea planta doar arbusti decorativi de inaltimi reduse (maxim cativa metri).
Gardul din fata nu va fi daramat in totalittate ci doar se vor face ma multe
intrari de acces;
-organizarea mai multor conferinte si acum se organizeaza conferinte
dar nu este exploatata inca la un nivel superior. Inmultirea numarului de
conferinte de relevanta internationala nu incurca cu nimic activitatea
Parlamentului.
-marirea traseului pentru vizitatori acum traseul pentru vizitatori
este extrem de redus aproape ridicol de redus avand in vedere posibilitatile de
vizitare din cladire. Programul trebuie sa fie foarte flexibil si disponibil de
la 8 la 20 in toate zilele saptamanii;
-curatenie pe toate laturile. Dupa garduri observam in multe colturi
aruncate diverse sticle si gunoaie.. chiar nu se poate face curat macar langa
CP?
-curatirea de urgenta a zonei virane de langa Academie. Zona e parasita
de atata vreme ca au crescut deja in mod natural copaci... faptul ca avem inca
gunoi in aceasta zona tine foarte mult de bunul simt...
Toate cele bune,
Catalin Cornea
--- In [email protected], Dan Ghelase <d...@...> wrote:
>
> Intradevar viitorul ei este incert...oricum solutia actuala e
> nefunctionala si paguboasa...
> La Dezbaterea dela Academie, arh.Dorin Stefan a facut un inteligent
> expozeu exact pe aceasta tema. Vorbind despre functionalitatile
> Bucurestilor a subliniat ca zona de agrement este concentrata in partea
> de nord, ea lipsind spre sud, zona Casei Popoului - Rahova fiind cam
> desarta...
> Prin realizarea unei zone verzi unind viitorul Parc Izvor-Parlament,
> prin terenurile actual virane din jurul noii Academii si Rahova, pana la
> Parcul Carol si P.Tineretului, zona s-ar resocializa prin aparitia unor
> ronduri-piatete-luminisuri adapostind diverse activitati
> atractiv-turistice...
> Obiectiv realizabil in timp, primul fiind cuprinderea CP intr-o centura
> de copaci inalti extinzand Parcul Izvor, tot timpul va indica
> oportunitati de reconversie pe masura redarii unor noi functionalitati
> ale zonei...
> Comentarii...?
> DG
>
>
>
> Vali wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/blogreview/2010/01/29/blog-03
> >
> > <http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/blogreview/2010/01/29/blog-03>
> >
> > *Lawmaker says historic building perfect for food, shoes and other
> > commerce*
> > By Paul Ciocoiu for Southeast European Times in Bucharest -- 29/01/10
> >
> > *The public is divided over a proposal to develop the world's second
> > largest building into the biggest mall in Europe.*
> > photo
> > Will the Romanian parliament become a shopping mall? [Victor
> > Barbu/SETimes]
> >
> > Silvius Prigoana thinks the parliament building where he serves as a
> > liberal-democrat would make a great mall for citizens and tourists and
> > a lot of money for Romania.
> >
> > The lawmaker plans to submit a bill on the issue, which he claims will
> > create more than 20,000 new jobs.
> >
> > The idea for Romania's seat of parliament -- known in the communist
> > era as the People's House and today as Parliament Palace -- has split
> > politicians and the public.
> >
> > A prosperous businessman with the backing of his peers in the
> > commercial world, Prigoana argues that one of Bucharest's main tourist
> > attractions is too expensive to maintain by the government. "From a
> > public spending point of view, [it is] a catastrophe," he said.
> >
> > The lawmaker noted that only 30% of the building is used, at a cost of
> > more than 50m euros a year.
> >
> > "When the state budget needs every penny, it is not permissible to
> > ignore a potential for several hundred million euros per year," said
> > Prigoana
> > <http://www.prigoana.ro/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26:qcasa-poporului-surs-de-venituri-la-bugetul-de-statq&catid=9:discursuri-politice&Itemid=15>on
> >
> > his blog. "I consider less important the subsequent fate of the
> > building or who will administer it ... instead of spending public
> > money, we make money for the budget."
> >
> > Economists said that a shopping centre at the palace -- which would be
> > four times larger than Afi Palace Cotroceni, currently the largest
> > mall in southeast Europe -- could bring Romania 100m euros in annual
> > revenue.
> >
> > Many bloggers disagree.
> >
> > "The building is part of Bucharest's history [and] identity ... and is
> > admired by foreigners. Why kill our history, tear the historic print
> > of our city, seized by the post-1989 frustrations, to try to build a
> > different Bucharest? A city lives with its history," said Ioana
> > Despina Camino
> > <http://despinacamino.blogspot.com/2010/01/daca-pana-si-casa-poporului-devine-mall_15.html>
> >
> > on her blog.
> >
> > Daniela
> > <http://www.urbaniulian.ro/2010/01/14/contrapropunere-la-transformarea-casei-poporului-in-mall/>dislikes
> >
> > the commercial idea while imagining the building for more cultured
> > purposes -- "a science centre: planetarium, aquarium, museum,
> > exhibition halls, theatre and cinema halls, libraries". She does not
> > believe anything will come of it.
> >
> > Alinp
> > <http://www.urbaniulian.ro/2010/01/14/contrapropunere-la-transformarea-casei-poporului-in-mall>noted
> >
> > tremendous sacrifices that went into constructing the building. "I say
> > that no state institutions should function there. If what they say is
> > true -- that the place was built with many human sacrifices and
> > suffering -- then I think that any decision taken there is not for the
> > country's benefit."
> >
> > Journalist Costi Rogozanu
> > <http://voxpublica.realitatea.net/politica-societate/casa-poporului-mall-sau-biblioteca-24488.html>
> >
> > took a worst case scenario perspective. "What if it doesn't work out?
> > What if the business fails?" he said, warning of the risk of a "huge
> > and deserted house, the symbol of Romanian capitalism, right at the
> > very heart of the city".
> >
> > Leon
> > <http://voxpublica.realitatea.net/politica-societate/casa-poporului-mall-sau-biblioteca-24488.html>
> >
> > agreed -- at least in principle -- with Prigoana. "The man seems to be
> > pragmatic. If they use only 30% of the building, why not use it all
> > for a bigger profit? I am sure they won't lack customers."
> >
>
