It looks fine if you don’t box it… which is the way it used to be before nested 
arrays …..

Peter
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Juergen Sauermann 
> <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Elias
> 
> like how?
> 
> One thing could be to set ⎕PW←1000 but that only avoids the indentation of 
> subsequent lines.
> Another way is to X←⍕BIG_MATRIX and then use ↑ and ↓ to display pieces of X. 
> Another simple
> trick is to ⍉ the dara before ⎕CRing it.
> 
> The general problem is that the way APL2 prints its output has been around 
> for very long, already
> since APL times, so changing it today will certainly confuse a number of 
> people (including myself).
> 
> /// Jürgen
> 
> 
> On 01/31/2017 05:35 AM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
>> When printing a one-dimensional array which is wider than ⎕PW, and using a 
>> ⎕CR mode which uses box-drawing characters such as 8 or 29, the output is 
>> quite unreadable.
>> 
>> For example, with ⎕PW←89 (standard for my Emacs session) this is what I get 
>> when printing ⍳100:
>> 
>>       29⎕CR ⍳100
>> ┏→━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
>> ┃1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 
>> 29 30 31 32 3
>>       3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 
>> 57 58 59 60 
>>       61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 
>> 84 85 86 87 88
>>        89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100┃
>> ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>       ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
>> 
>> There must be a way to primat this in a nicer way.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Elias
>> 
> 

Reply via email to