Hi Elias, first of all, ⎕CR cannot possibly know what ⎕PW means. It produces an APL text matrix from an APL value. The rules for doing this were basically fixed by IBM through a workspace called DISPLAY which is shipped with the IBM interpreter. I found that workspace quite handy and wanted it to be a built-in function rather than a workspace that you need to )COPY before using it. But I would not like to make it too different from the original DISPLAY workspace for compatibility reasons. As you know, IBM compatibility rules for GNU APL. But the proposal for limiting ]BOXING sounds feasible. In order to not create incompatibilities with previous versions of GNU APL I would like to propose that we use negative ]BOXING numbers for not-boxing large arrays and positive ones for the current way of printing the output. I will look into this. /// Jürgen On 02/01/2017 10:16 AM, Elias Mårtenson
wrote:
|
- [Bug-apl] Formatting of large arrays Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large arrays Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large arrays Peter Teeson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large arrays Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large arrays Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large array... Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of large ... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting of la... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Formatting o... Elias Mårtenson