<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CompleteResidueSystem.html
<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CompleteResidueSystem.html>>
> On Jun 24, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Juergen Sauermann
> <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> I am glad to hear that. It is in SVN 971 now. It was Jay who moved us into
> the right
> direction, thanks for that. I had used the Donell paper earlier (when
> designing complex
> floor) but the borderline cases (i.e. when ⎕CT makes a difference) were not
> considered
> in the paper, and the descriptions in both ISO and the APL2 language
> reference are
> entirely misleading in that respect.
>
> Have a nice weekend,
>
> Best Regards,
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 06/24/2017 07:55 PM, Frederick Pitts wrote:
>> Hello Jürgen,
>>
>> SUCCESS.
>>
>> The cut-and-paste below from my platform is identical to yours
>>
>> 5J3 | ¯7J6
>> ⎕CT is: 1e-13
>> modulus (A) is: (5,3)
>> A=0 is: (0,0)
>> A+A=0 is: (5,3)
>> B÷A+A=0 is: (-0.5,1.5)
>> ⌊B÷A+A=0 is: (0,1)
>> A×⌊B÷A+A=0 is: (-3,5)
>> B-A×⌊B÷A+A=0 is: (-4,1)
>> ¯4J1
>>
>> and 5J3 | 4J¯1 ¯4J1 give the correct answer too.
>>
>> If you want, I can patch the undebugged version of Complex.cc and run a
>> battery of tests. If not, I will wait and run the tests on the next SVN
>> version.
>>
>> I think i need to find something useful to do with Gaussian integers.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fred
>
