* Andreas Matthias (2007-01-24) writes: > Ralf Angeli wrote: > >> * Andreas Matthias (2007-01-23) writes: >> >>> ps: Emacs 22.0.50.1 -- Could this be the reason? >> >> Probably. At least it works here with "GNU Emacs 22.0.92.1 >> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2007-01-07 on neutrino". > > Thank you. That was the real problem. > > BTW: 22.0.92.1 works for me, but the very recent 22.0.93.1 doesn't. > (LaTeX: Symbol's function definition is void: sit-for)
Is that a CVS version or the pretest tarball? I just compiled a CVS version and doing `C-c C-c LaTeX RET' works just fine. Perhaps something went wrong during the build process? > I really should > look into, why I wasn't happy with 21.4. It's probably the saver > alternative. It probably depends upon you preferring to deal with known bugs which likely won't be fixed or with bugs you don't know but which will likely get fixed if you report them. I'm likely updating more often than you and I've been encountering bugs in CVS Emacs _very_ seldom. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
