David Kastrup wrote: > Andreas Matthias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ralf Angeli wrote: >> >>> * Andreas Matthias (2007-01-24) writes: >>> >>>> Ralf Angeli wrote: >>>> >>>>> * Andreas Matthias (2007-01-23) writes: >>>>> >>>>>> ps: Emacs 22.0.50.1 -- Could this be the reason? >>>>> >>>>> Probably. At least it works here with "GNU Emacs 22.0.92.1 >>>>> (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2007-01-07 on neutrino". >>>> >>>> Thank you. That was the real problem. >>>> >>>> BTW: 22.0.92.1 works for me, but the very recent 22.0.93.1 doesn't. >>>> (LaTeX: Symbol's function definition is void: sit-for) >>> >>> Is that a CVS version or the pretest tarball? >> >> Yes. > > Not helpful. It could only have been one of the two with that version > number. Which of the two?
Sorry. It was the CVS version. >>> I just compiled a CVS version and doing `C-c C-c LaTeX RET' works >>> just fine. >> >> I just did a `cvs up'. And again the same error. > > So apparently the latter of the two. Has this been the case with your > last attempt, too? Yes. The CVS I checked out in the morning. Compilation with `make' seemed to run fine; no error messages. But M-x preview-buffer did not preview anything and the error message was: LaTeX: Symbol's function definition is void: sit-for >>> Perhaps something went wrong during the build process? >> >> Yes, definitely. I compiled emacs only with `make', which produced >> the aforementioned error. After compiling it again with `make bootstrap' >> everything's working fine. >> >> Oh my. Maybe bootstrap is not just a waste of time? ;-) > > The bare minimum is > cd lisp > make cvs-update > cd .. > make Oh. I didn't know about `make cvs-update'. > and even then you might need to bootstrap at some point or other. It > is nonsensical reporting a compilation bug before you have done so. Ok. Maybe I'll become an aficionado of bootstrap. Ciao Andreas _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
