Hi Tassilo,
sorry, I didn't specify that this occurs when the bibliography is
typeset using biblatex, with that package it's legal to use more than
one `\bibliography'. Moreover, using `\addbibresource' instead of
`\bibliography' (and this is the standard in `biblatex') it's
impossible to use a comma separated list of bibliography database
files, so multiple `\addbibresource's are needed.
Bye,
Mosè
2013/10/29 Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org>:
> Mosè Giordano <giordano.m...@libero.it> writes:
>
> Hi Mosè,
>
>> it seems RefTeX (I'm running Emacs 24.3.1) cannot manage multiple
>> bibliography database files specified using multiple `\bibliography'
>> macros. Consider these examples:
>>
>> \bibliography{foo,bar}
>>
>> and
>>
>> \bibliography{foo}
>> \bibliography{bar}
>
> The second version isn't legal, i.e., bibtex itself can't handle it.
> Here's what bibtex says on a test document (foo is bib1 in there, bar is
> bib2).
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Running `BibTeX' on `bar' with ``bibtex bar''
> This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013)
> The top-level auxiliary file: bar.aux
> The style file: alpha.bst
> Illegal, another \bibdata command---line 8 of file bar.aux
> : \bibdata
> : {bib2}
> I'm skipping whatever remains of this command
> Database file #1: bib1.bib
> Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "bib2book"
> (There was 1 error message)
>
> TeX Output exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Oct 29 08:27:50
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> So it only uses the first database file, and that's exactly what
> `reftex-get-bibfile-list' returns.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
