Faheem Mitha <[email protected]> writes: >> But as said: if someone volunteers to figure out how to get AUCTeX >> into debbugs.gnu.org, please do so. It's probably not too hard. > > Well, I could potentially do it, but wouldn't some official person > need to sign off on it? I have no official connection to either the > AUCTeX project or the GNU project.
Sure you have: You know me, and I'm one of the AUCTeX maintainers. :-) But no need to figure out how to get AUCTeX into debbugs: it's properly documented here: http://debbugs.gnu.org/Using.html I'll do that when I find some spare time after my move which might take another week or two. Mosè, if you want, you can also do it whenever you want. As maintainer email address, we'd use [email protected], and debbugs should take over mails sent to [email protected]. We should ask on help-debbugs how that works out best. The page says that mails to a taken over list would create new bug issues in debbugs. That's great, but how about replies to existing bug mails? I don't want debbugs issues like "Re: foobar broken" where the original report mail isn't included. Bye, Tassilo [1] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-debbugs _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
