> returning also empty strings. This change is not even mentioned in
> the Incompatible Lisp Changes section of the NEWS file.
Lots of changes aren't mentioned. Only the ones that we expect to be
noticed are mentioned.
> For the time being I don't have a solution, apart from defining
> `TeX-completing-read-multiple' as the old version of
> `completing-read-multiple', or someone fixing
> `completing-read-multiple' upstream, at least making
> trimming optional.
IIUC you always need a leading \, so you could simply always add
a leading backslash if one is missing.
Of course, I'm not sure that IUC.
> Would it be possible to make trimming optional (off by default), using
> an optional argument?
I'd rather we don't go down that path.
> In AUCTeX we support all Emacs versions starting from 21, so a new
> mandatory argument wouldn't be a good idea for us.
FWIW, this code only works as intended in Emacs>=22 (since crm-separator
didn't exist in Emacs-21).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
