Hi Stefan, 2015-03-09 18:56 GMT+01:00 Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca>: >> returning also empty strings. This change is not even mentioned in >> the Incompatible Lisp Changes section of the NEWS file. > > Lots of changes aren't mentioned. Only the ones that we expect to be > noticed are mentioned.
Well, this was noticed too ;-) >> For the time being I don't have a solution, apart from defining >> `TeX-completing-read-multiple' as the old version of >> `completing-read-multiple', or someone fixing >> `completing-read-multiple' upstream, at least making >> trimming optional. > > IIUC you always need a leading \, so you could simply always add > a leading backslash if one is missing. > Of course, I'm not sure that IUC. Unfortunately no, one can also insert the unit without using macros, so we can't always add the leading backslash Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
