Hi Ikumi, Sorry, I just got up. The results is the same: a dot followed with a newline "\n"
Best, Liyu On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 2:08 AM, Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Liyu, > > Could you tell me what the output of > (call-process "kpsewhich" nil (list standard-output nil) nil > "--expand-path" "{.,./.}") > is? If that is ".;./.", we can use it to know the right path > delimiter. > > Regards, > Ikumi Keita > >>>>>> Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes: >> Hi Liyu, >>>>>> Liyu Gong <[email protected]> writes: >>> Sorry for multiple replies. But I just noticed that my cursor moves to >>> the next line after evaluation. So I guess there is a ".\n" inserted. > >>> Thanks, >>> Liyu > >>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Liyu Gong <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Ikumi, >>>> >>>> After evaluation, there is only a dot inserted right at where I type "C-x >>>> C-e". >>>> . >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Liyu > >> Thanks. Hmm, strange result... Here both texlive for freebsd and >> texlive for w32 don't remove ".." from the output, even when the current >> directory is the root directory. When the result doesn't contain >> neither ":" nor ";", AUCTeX cannot know the right path delimiter. >> Sorry, let me think for for a while. > >> Regards, >> Ikumi Keita > >>>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Liyu, thanks for your patience. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Liyu Gong <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>> Hi Ikumni, >>>>>> The result of the evaluation is: 1 (#o1, #x1, ?\C-a) >>>>> >>>>> Ah, no, what I'd like to know is not the lisp return value, but the >>>>> string inserted in the buffer. What string is inserted in the buffer >>>>> when you put the point just after the following form in *scratch* buffer >>>>> and type C-x C-e ? >>>>> >>>>> (call-process "kpsewhich" nil >>>>> (list standard-output nil) nil >>>>> "--expand-path" "{.,..}") >>>>> >>>>> I suspect that it is ".:..", not ".;..". If this speculation is >>>>> correct, then cygwin version of kpsewhich is used at auto detection. >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I do have a cygwin version TeX distribution. But I just double >>>>>> checked. I didn't put the cygwin path in windows PATH, or in emacs >>>>>> exec-path. >>>>> >>>>> Hmm. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ikumi Keita _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
