> Sadly, I now have another problem. Consider this:
>
> \def\XINT:NE:f:noeval:from:braced:u:p #1#2%
> {\detokenize{\romannumeral`$XINT_expr_null\expandafter#1}~expanded{{#2}}}%
>
> There is $ in there, and it triggers math mode highlighting which is a
> priori fine, I can live with that *if I can constrain it to not extend
> beyond that line*
>
> In the past I would control it this way:
>
> \def\XINT:NE:f:noeval:from:braced:u:p #1#2%
>
> {\detokenize{\romannumeral`$XINT_expr_null\expandafter#1}~expanded{{#2}}}%$
>
> (observe the added $ at end of second line after the % comment character)
>
> With your patch the %$ does not stop the math highlighting !
Now that you've mentioned it, I remember I wanted to do that change also
in the past and Keita-san stopped me from doing so for exactly this
reason.
I've pushed another commit which ignores $ in comments with the single
exception of the "% $ \n" workaround, i.e., a comment with just a $,
arbitrary spaces/tabs before or after the $, and then the end of the
line.
I'm not sure what is worse. The restriction to have at least balanced $
also in comments, or the now very restrictive workaround form. We'll
see if someone complains because that breaks his
% Workaround fix $.
comment fixes.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
