Hello Tassilo=Keita-san Le 12 mai 2021 à 08:49, Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> a écrit :
> Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes: > > Hi Ikumi, > >>> Would it make sense to apply these rules: >> >>> 1. a $ in comments can never start math mode >>> 2. but it can and will always stop math mode >> >> That is a clean idea and, fortunately, easy to implment. Could you test >> the attached patch? > > I've committed a completely identical patch an hour ago with a diff just > in the comment explaining what we are doing. It's very encouraging when > we both have the very same idea, so I think, it cannot be too wrong. :-) > > Thanks, > Tassilo It is now revealed you are only one entity (perhaps an A.I. based on quantum computing) pretending to be two humans only to justify coverage of all time zones ! I have pulled the commit and it appears to work fine in my real-life files (using doctex mode) But I notice something weird when comparing effect on those two files File A behaves as expected % -*- mode: latex; -*- % \def\foo_with_underscore{} \newcommand\foo{$}% % a comment A foo_bar^bar{$} % a comment B foo_bar^bar{$} % a comment C foo_bar^bar $ % % File B seems to have a problem % -*- mode: latex; -*- % \def\foo_with_underscore{} \newcommand\foo{$}%$ % a comment A foo_bar^bar{$} % a comment B foo_bar^bar{$} % a comment C foo_bar^bar $ % % In case of file B, which differs only by an added %$ at end of the \newcommand line, the \newcommand for example is not highlighted and the B line changes colors without applying script style, see screenshot In case of file B I was expecting the B line to be styled in math mode, it only has its color it seems, and I was not expecting \newcommand\foo to lose its highlighting, Perhaps this is a symptom of something else? Best, Jean-François
_______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex