Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>> Paul Nelson <[email protected]> writes:
>> As a fix, we could either:
>
>> (i) Do (save-restriction (widen) ...) in TeX-fold-macro-nth-arg before
>> (TeX-verbatim-p).
>
>> (ii) Do (save-restriction (widen) ...) in LaTeX-verbatim-p.
>
>> The advantage of (ii) is that it arguably fixes the root cause rather
>> than just patching it at the source. The disadvantage is that I don't
>> know off hand whether this would affect other calls to
>> LaTeX-verbatim-p in an undesired way. I lean in favor of (i) for now,
>> and have updated my patch accordingly, but would welcome other
>> feedback.
>
> I don't have particular preference,
I think we should go with (i) and let the caller decide.
> so I think we can install your change, provided that no objection is
> raised.
@Paul: How does you change work in a file like this:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fvextra}
\begin{document}
Vanilla \verb|LaTeX|
With \Verb|fvextra|, or \Verb[fontsize=\scriptsize]|fvextra|.
With \Verb{fvextra}, or \Verb[fontsize=\scriptsize]{fvextra}.
\end{document}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> Thank you for your contribution!
+1.
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
