Hi Raghuzar, > I like this proposal. It is backward compatible I think it should also > allow us to deal with optional arguments in a function spec.
OK, great. I'll try fleshing it out when I get the chance. > Currently if the spec is a function it only receives the mandatory > arguments. If the number of arguments is part of the spec we can allow > it to receive up to p+q args without breaking existing code. Regarding optional arguments, I am in the habit of extracting those using TeX-fold-macro-nth-arg. This is possible because (with recent enough AUCTeX) the function display spec is always called with point at the beginning of the macro to be folded. See for instance the implementation of TeX-fold-cite-display. For this reason, I'm inclined to first implement the proposal without changing how optional args are used - we could change that later, if desired. Thanks, best, Paul _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
