Hi Rahguzar > Thanks, this works for my needs. I was worried about optional arguments > before the mandatory ones messing up the folding but those arguments > actually get swallowed by the folding. With your suggestion of using > TeX-fold-macro-nth-arg it is possible to handle optional args that come > before mandatory ones which passing a 1 or (0 . 1) as spec. A bit > confusing but it improves on the current situation and I don't think it > is possible handle folding perfectly given how "flexible" syntax in > (La)TeX is.
I'm glad it seems to be working for your needs, although I'm a bit confused about what else you might be asking for here, i.e., what would "perfect" folding like? Paul _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
