Hi Al,

Responding just to the structural question for now.  I think I
miscommunicated:

> We could frame the feature as what's being displayed by default, with
> display-styles for either mode being after-string, before-string or
> buframe's.

I wasn't proposing to change what's displayed *by default* for all
previews, but rather what's shown *after entering an existing preview*.
The options would include:

- just the construction symbol and the tex code (default behavior in
  AUCTeX)

- the preview before the tex code (current behavior of
  preview-leave-open-previews-visible t)

- the preview after the tex code

- a buframe showing the preview

Does that clarify?  Could either shoehorn this option into
preview-leave-open-previews-visible, or absorb that into a new defcustom
('preview-reveal-display'?) taking the values 'none, 'after, 'before,
'buframe.  The issue is orthogonal to preview-point vs. normal -- it's
just about "reveal behavior on entry".  Note that we're not trying to
edit inside the preview image - we're just choosing how the preview is
displayed when the tex source is made visible after you enter the
overlay.

Does that clarify?  I think this would be useful (e.g., I would try it
out with traditional previews).

Paul



_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

Reply via email to