Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Paul, Alexandre,
>
> * Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:43:04PM CEST:
>> OK, but the new test he added (marked '+' below):
>>
>> { ac_out=`sed -n '/\${datarootdir}/p' "$tmp/out"`; test -n "$ac_out"; } &&
>> + { ac_out=`sed -n '/^[[ ]]*datarootdir[[ ]]*:*=/p' "$tmp/out"`;
>> test -z "$ac_out"; } &&
>>
>> looks pretty portable to me. If it breaks, then I'd expect the
>> existing sed-based test to break too.
>
> Well. This change causes us to issue a warning for an empty .in file.
> So, apologies for rejecting it for the wrong reason. ;-)
The change only adds an extra condition that must be fulfilled, so all
it can do is silence the existing warning, I don't see how it can
possibly cause an extra warning (and I certainly don't see one here
with an empty .in file). Or do you mean you get a warning from sed or
something like this?
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
