Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Easier would be to simply release what we've got.
> 
> I was thinking the same thing.  We have a whole bunch of relatively low-
> risk patches stacked up in git, might as well call them 2.73.
> 
> ... Also, does anyone know of any high-importance
> patches waiting for review, or other high-importance bugs that should be
> addressed ASAP?

There are these proposed patches for
  https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?111272
  https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?111273
that allow distros to use 'autoreconf' in their packages, when GNU gettext
0.23.2, 0.24.2, 0.25.1, 0.26 or newer is installed. (Without these patches,
Debian encountered build failures in more than 200 packages [1].)

I will revise them tomorrow, to enable compatibility with older gettext
releases, as requested [2], and then I would like to ask for a re-review
and inclusion.

Bruno

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2025-06/msg00009.html
[2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2025-07/msg00030.html




Reply via email to