On 12/2/16 6:07 AM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> And second patch we use because of xpg-echo. Would it have sense to have
> it included, or maybe stop the tests completely instead?
You could just have turned off the xpg_echo option instead of going through
a convoluted test (which just emulates `shopt -q') to determine whether or
not it's on, but it does need to be off.
This demonstrates just how incompatible echo is across shells.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
