in my version 4.4.0(1), `umask' gives me a numeric output of `0022', while `umask -S' gives me an output of `u=rwx,g=rx,o=rx'. Shouldn't umask -S also formulate the mask in a negative way, as does `umask'? Thus giving out `u=,g=w,o=w'?
greetings, kalle
