Am 08.11.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Eduardo Bustamante:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:06 AM, kalle <ka...@projektwerkstatt.de> wrote:
> [...]
>>> From umask(1p):
>>>   For a symbolic_mode value, the new value of the file mode creation mask
>>>   shall be the logical complement of the file permission bits portion  of
>>>   the file mode specified by the symbolic_mode string.
>>
>> This sentence is inacceptably complicate. Furthermore, it is not clear
>> which symbolic mode string is meant at the end of the sentence, but I
>> suppose it has been written by you to undermine the given facts.
> 
> Eh, what?

sorry, this was really a wrong formulation - I meant "it has been cited
by you as an argument for the status quo"


Reply via email to