is correct, as "foo" does not contain a ']' which would be required > to match there (quoting the ':' means there is no character class, > hence we have instead (the negation of) a char class containing '[' ':' > 'l' 'o' 'w' 'e' ';r' (and ':' again), preceded by anything, and > followed by ']' and anything. foo does not match. f]oo would. >
where exactly is this documented in the standard?
