See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01393.html
versus
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/msg01394.html
The former was with ld 2.18.50.20071227. The latter was with
2.18.50.20070929.
In the g++ tests, I see stuff like
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/
home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc
/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C -nostdinc++ -I/home/dave/
gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/g
cc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libst
dc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/
home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -ansi
-pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long -fno-show-column -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob
jdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-l
inux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libib
erty -lm -o ./ice990323-2.exe (timeout = 300)
PASS: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc+
+-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:.:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./
libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libstdc++-v3/s
rc/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-li
nux/libstdc++-v3/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libmudflap/.libs
:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libssp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/ob
jdir/hppa-linux/libgomp/.libs:/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc:/home/dave/gnu
/gcc-4.3/objdir/./prev-gcc:/usr/lib/debug
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'A<double, 47, A<int, 37, short>
>'
terminate called recursively
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/ice990323-2.C execution test
In the libstdc++ tests, I see stuff like
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc -B/hom
e/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa
-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/
src/.libs -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/bin/ -B/home/dave/opt/
gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/lib/ -isystem
/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-
linux/include -isystem /home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.3.0/hppa-linux/sys-include
-g
-O2 -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g
-
O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/home/dave/
gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa-linux -I/home/dave/gnu/
gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/
libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -Wl,--gc-sections
/home/
dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_d
erivation.cc -include bits/stdc++.h ./libtestc++.a -lm -o ./cons_virtual_d
erivation.exe (timeout = 600)
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr
table will be created.
output is:
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no
.eh_frame_hdr
table will be created.
FAIL: 18_support/bad_alloc/cons_virtual_derivation.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/opt/gnu/bin/ld: error in /tmp/cceASdJq.o(.eh_frame); no
.eh_frame_hdr
table will be created.
--
Summary: eh support is broken
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
