Rather than reporting 'suffix or operands invalid ...' on all three instructions
when there is no operand size specifier on the memory operand, 'ambiguous
operand size ...' should be reported - the former message implies that a memory
operand may not be used at all here:
.intel_syntax noprefix
.text
Start:
vcvtpd2dq xmm0, [ecx]
vcvtpd2ps xmm0, [ecx]
vcvttpd2dq xmm0, [ecx]
--
Summary: wrong diagnostic for vcvtpd2dq/vcvtpd2ps/vcvttpd2dq
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jbeulich at novell dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6518
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
