------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-09-08 16:37 ------- Hi Ryan,
I may be confused here, but -4294967296 is the same as "-(0x100000000)", right ? So wouldn't that mean that the 2.19.1 assembler was wrong and that the current assembler, with the patch applied, is correct ? Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11972 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
