http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356
--- Comment #6 from Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail dot com> 2011-01-11 12:10:18 UTC --- Wouldn't it be easier to just apply H.J. new patch on top of binutils trunk? I a 2nd thought I am thinking of cherry-picking PR ld/12237 (which is in binutils/experimental, see [1]), PR ld/12001 + PR ld/12356 for binutils-2_21-branch [2]. Not sure if reverting the patch is such a good idea. I am running here a debianized version with the 3 patches for i386 since 02-Jan-2010. - Sedat - [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.21-3/changelog [2] http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/binutils-2_21-branch -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils