http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356

--- Comment #6 from Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail dot com> 2011-01-11 
12:10:18 UTC ---
Wouldn't it be easier to just apply H.J. new patch on top of binutils trunk?

I a 2nd thought I am thinking of cherry-picking PR ld/12237 (which is in
binutils/experimental, see [1]), PR ld/12001 + PR ld/12356 for
binutils-2_21-branch [2]. Not sure if reverting the patch is such a good idea.

I am running here a debianized version with the 3 patches for i386 since
02-Jan-2010.

- Sedat -

[1]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/binutils/binutils_2.21-3/changelog
[2]
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/binutils-2_21-branch

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to