http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-01-23 18:36:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > When there are "IR-object non-IR-archive IR-object" on command line, > > LTO makes it equivalent to "IR-object IR-object non-IR-archive". > > It seems this behavior isn't documented. It is fixed by commit 5ec86f21a2370249ae49ffb3dc0e438d67a39522 on hjl/lto-mixed branch. > > When there are "IR-object non-IR-archive IR-object" on command line, > > LTO makes it equivalent to "IR-object IR-object non-IR-archive". > > It also happens with IR-archive (though IR is not used: "ld.hjl: LTO IR > sections in libdiv.a(div.o) aren't used in stage 2 linking"). > I will try to change linker to ignore libdiv.a(div.o) in this case. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
