http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13178
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-09-11 18:29:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > X86_64_GLOB_DAT was used to preempt f. Will preempt work without > > X86_64_GLOB_DAT? > > You mean preloading such an object? Why should this matter? Any relocation > will only look at the symbol record in the DSO with the definition. This will > prevoke the indirect function be called, even in the case of dlsym(). > > What do I miss? Please describe the situation I think needs this relocation. There may be another 'f' definition in executable or a DSO before u.so. We need to make sure that f in u.so isn't used in this case by updating its GOT entry. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
