http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13300
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2011-10-25 15:53:29 UTC --- Hi Pascal, > Well yeah, of course this will work here (FILNMLEN being used only at those > two > places). But it's still very prone to break in other places due to the design > of those include files. I wonder what the reasoning might have been to > override > FILNMLEN in coff/pe.h (even #undefining it in case it already exists), even if > it has already been used in a declaration. Agreed. It was mainly because I do not know the answer to this question that I was reluctant to change the definitions of FILNMLEN. > In the meantime, do I have permission to use your patch under GPLv2 (important > for backporting)? Yes, you do. Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
