http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13421
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2011-11-25 14:16:56
UTC ---
Hi Dave,
> Instead, a {section,address} pair should be generated by
> applying the relocation addend to the target symbol's
> {section,address} pair, with the resultant pair used
> for locating the unwind opcodes and function symbol.
Actually this is being done already - it is just that the code that did this
was broken...
Please try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think.
The patch includes a lot of formatting and coding tidy-ups, (although not the
full code refactoring that you suggested), so it may be hard to find the real
changes. The fixes are as follows:
1. Correctly initialize the rel_type field in the arm_section structure.
2. When displaying the function name, use the computed function
section/offset abdaddr structure, not the entry absaddr structure.
Cheers
Nick
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
