https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19005
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #9)
> No, it's the call to bfd_set_section_contents in which the UB occurs. You
> can see this with valgrind:
>
I got
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19005]$ cat x.S
.text
.byte 1,2,3
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19005]$ make x.o
gcc -B./ -c -o x.o x.S
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19005]$ valgrind ./objcopy -O binary -j .text --pad-to=6
--reverse-bytes=6 x.o y.o
==23717== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==23717== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==23717== Using Valgrind-3.10.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==23717== Command: ./objcopy -O binary -j .text --pad-to=6 --reverse-bytes=6
x.o y.o
==23717==
./objcopy: cannot reverse bytes: length of section .text must be evenly
divisible by 6
==23717==
==23717== HEAP SUMMARY:
==23717== in use at exit: 24,739 bytes in 35 blocks
==23717== total heap usage: 99 allocs, 64 frees, 36,615 bytes allocated
==23717==
==23717== LEAK SUMMARY:
==23717== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23717== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23717== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23717== still reachable: 24,739 bytes in 35 blocks
==23717== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23717== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==23717==
==23717== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==23717== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
[hjl@gnu-6 pr19005]$
> Neither patch fixes that. Both also leave the interleave code broken, I
> think.
We need a testcase for interleave.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
