https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm.com> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Peter, I haven't investigated why gcc is misbehaving and I'm supposed to be > on vacation. It is almost certainly an error in rs6000.h:ASM_CPU_SPEC. Yes, it was a missing option in ASM_CPU_SPEC. Patch submitted upstream. I'll note that -mcpu=powerpc64le was already correctly setting the internal TARGET_* flags in gcc to make it mimic -mcpu=power8. The only missing part was the ASM_CPU_SPEC part to get the correct assembler option passed down. FYI, the GCC patch is located here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02054.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
