https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20247
--- Comment #8 from bg at nerilex dot org --- Hi Nick, tested it, and it works like a charm :-). Although I think it should be investigated if the current default behavior should be considered "buggy". I can not really come up with a scenario where this padding makes sens (that doe not necessarily mean there is none). The section is only padded at the end, so there is no label which is modified by the padding. So it could only have affect during linking when code is positioned. In my current opinion the alignment of the start of section boundaries should depend on the definition of the code containing the section to start or the linker(-script). But I do not really know much about the ARC-architecture maybe rules are different there. Cheers, ~ bg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
