https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21076
--- Comment #2 from Alex <afranchuk at lgsinnovations dot com> --- Nick, Thanks for the hint. I realize the difficulty not having a test case represents. If I figure out exactly what is triggering it (but can't figure out how to fix it) I'll make a minimal reproduction. I will look where you suggested. I also found that looking at the various _bfd_XXi_swap_* in bfd/peXXigen.c has been helpful. In particular, I see that in _bfd_XXi_swap_sym_in, empty idata$4 and idata$5 sections are created, and they are being created at the correct times after pe_ILF_build_a_bfd is called for each DLL's symbols. So at that point at least, I can verify that it's not as if the empty entries are simply being omitted. Nothing obvious sticks out in _bfd_XXi_swam_sym_out either, which I thought could be a likely place where the bug was residing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
