https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at sourceware dot org> --- Created attachment 9899 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9899&action=edit uclibc_nonshared.a Reports should not rely on the contents of external sites, so I've extracted the relevant test-case information. Assuming these files were correctly uploaded despite the attachment-types mishap, they're the preferred means to repeat the bug together with the command-line parameters (to e.g. ld-new): --eh-frame-hdr -mcrislinux -shared -o libuClibc-1.0.22.so -mcrislinux --warn-common --warn-once -z combreloc -O2 -z defs -O1 --version-script libc.map -init __uClibc_init -soname=libc.so.1 --whole-archive libc_so.a --no-whole-archive interp.os ld-uClibc.so.1 uclibc_nonshared.a libpthread_nonshared.a libgcc.a And yes, I could have tarred them together. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
