https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21351
Bug ID: 21351 Summary: documentation for --relax Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: weremaid at gmx dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9968 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9968&action=edit patch containing alternative The documentation for --relax isn't clear about whether or not the use of --no-relax causes an error when the feature is not supported on a platform. The sentence in question is: "On platforms where --relax is accepted the option --no-relax can be used to disable the feature." (there's a comma missing after "accepted") The set containing all platforms has previously been divided into those where it is 1. supported or 2. ignored. ("On platforms where this is not supported, --relax is accepted, but ignored.") If I'm not mistaken, the conditional "On platforms where --relax is accepted" means "all platforms". Imho, "[On all platforms,] --no-relax can be used to disable the feature" should then also distinguish between supported and merely ignored. There's a patch with a proposal attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils