--- Comment #22 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail dot
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #21)
> (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #20)
> > Note that while the assembler change is a nice improvement, the original
> > issue still exists.
> > In the testcase that I attached before, the call to foo is now assembled to
> > R_X86_64_PLT32, but
> > .long foo - .
> > Still produces a R_X86_64_PC32 as it has to.
> > Since foo has default visibility, the linker could create a canonical plt
> > entry to be the runtime address of foo.
> Please open a separate bug for this.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
bug-binutils mailing list