https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22967
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Martin, Thanks. Now the question is what letter should we use for global ifunc symbols ? I see three options: 1. Use 'I' for global ifunc symbols and another character (eg '>') for indirect symbols. 2. Leave 'I' as it is (ie indicating an indirect symbol) and use another character (eg 'F') for global ifuncs. 3. Leave 'I' as it is and use another pair of characters (eg 'f' and 'F') for ifuncs symbols. Do you have any preference ? We also have the issue of backwards compatibility. There are probably tools out there the rely upon the current characters returned by nm, so this behaviour will have to be controlled by a command line option. Perhaps something like: --global-ifunc-char=<character> Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils