https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23854
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #20) > I disasmed and diffed the object files > without and with your patch. I see a lot of: > --- > 597,598c597,598 > < 745: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi > < 749: 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%edi,%eiz,1),%edi > --- > > 745: 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi > > 74c: 8d 74 26 00 lea 0x0(%esi,%eiz,1),%esi > --- > > Is this correct, that it now applies lea to > %esi twice? As %esi is used as both arg and > result, I think it will be modified twice, > and so I can't imagine those changes lead to > an equivalent code. These are NOPs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
