Hi Dmitry, >>> Still, even this way, 400 bytes is more then twice as big, compared to >>> fasm. Any suggestions, how to shrink binary futher?
> Thank you for suggestion. Tried both options; no difference -- 400 > bytes. Ho Hum. In which case, do you know what is in the extra bytes ? If you link with the -Map=foo.map option you should get a map file which shows you how the output was constructed. Perhaps this can help you find out where the extra bytes are coming from. Cheers Nick _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
