https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26685
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > symbol(%rip) is similar to symbol and DISP. There is no real register > > in memory operand. > > I disagree - the compiler ought to emit > > movdir64b foo(%eip), %eax > > or > > movdir64b foo(%rip), %rax This is wrong for x32. > in this case, whatever fits the x32 model better. The compiler ought to in > particular be aware that the register operand of this insn is > address-size-prefix, not operand-size-/REX-prefix controlled. There is no RIP register in GCC. It isn't a real register. GCC always generate foo(%rip). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
