https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25882
--- Comment #8 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> --- Also note that while, for musl targets, this issue could also be fixed just by getting gcc not to build its ld128 functions in libgcc_s, there are also people using glibc's ld64 ABI, and glibc necessarily has (as ABI) both ld64 and ld128 functions in the same shared library. So I don't think there's any complete fix without reverting this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
