https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0)
> cat > a.s <<eof
> .globl foo
> .symver foo, foo@v1
> foo: nop
> eof
> echo 'v1 {};' > a.ver
> cat > b.s <<eof
> .globl foo_v1
> foo_v1: nop
> .symver foo_v1, foo@v1
> eof
>
> exit
>
>
> GNU ld has a special rule removing foo if foo@v1 is defined. gold and LLD
This is done on purpose. A single '@' defines a 'hidden' versioned symbol,
which is intended for dynamic linker and shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy
the unversioned reference. ld behavior is correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
