https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26865
--- Comment #15 from Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org> --- (In reply to Eli Zaretskii from comment #14) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #13) > > Hi Guys, > > > > How about a compromise ? Instead of changing the behaviour of > > --preprocessor > > and --preprocessor-arg, I could add two new options --quoted-preprocessor > > and > > --quoted-preprocessor-arg. (Abbreviated to -qp and -qpa). These new > > options > > would unconditionally surround their arguments in double quotes. Would > > that > > work for everyone ? > > I think only --quoted-preprocessor-arg is needed, because everyone agreed > the way --preprocessor worked before the last revert is correct and doesn't > affect the issue in PR 27594. So if you don't mind, I'd like to reinstate > the changes in `quot` which were mistakenly reverted. Ping! Nick, should I just revert the erroneous revert in `quot`? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.