https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #8 from pjones at redhat dot com <pjones at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7) > (In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #6) > > FYI I've got a partial implementation here: > > https://github.com/vathpela/binutils/tree/efi-app-aa64 ; it still needs some > > work. Among other problems, I'm very not thrilled with the way the common > > header file is generated, as it's racy and failure prone during the build. > > Hi!, > > Awesome, thanks for getting the ball rolling on this! > > Unfortunately I can't look at the code to give any feedback until the > copyright has been assigned to the FSF. Would it be possible for you to > push the branch to the binutils repo on sourceware? > > Cheers, > Tamar I don't have access push to the binutils repo on sourceware, but Red Hat does have a copyright assignment agreement for this sort of thing. Additionally, there's really nothing here that isn't derived from existing binutils code. >From my perspective, in terms of copyright it is safe to assume this is is acceptable for upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
