https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28143
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to andy from comment #0)
> (bfd_elf_define_start_stop): Don't modify ldscript_def syms.
> was this change in behaviour around ldscripts intentional or is this a bug?
That was a deliberate change. I believe it was wrong for ld to modify a user
definition of some symbol that just happens to match a linker defined symbol.
If you want these symbols to be protected visibility, you can do that by making
a reference to them protected. eg.
$ cat foo.s
.data
.protected foo
.dc.a foo
$ as -o foo.o foo.s
$ ld -o foo foo.o --defsym foo=0
$ readelf -s foo | grep foo
3: 0000000000000000 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL PROTECTED ABS foo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
