https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Created attachment 13968 [details] > Proposed Patch > > Hi Richard, > > How about this patch ? > > I was unsure what should be done with the other potential values > for Tag_ABI_HardFP_use so I left them alone. > > Cheers > Nick I need to think about this a bit. The object file is arguably buggy in that it says that it uses hw fp, but doesn't say which version. But if we report an error (or a warning) we probably should do that for all input objects, not just the first on the list. Also, if we agree the object is buggy, we should probably have code in the assembler to fault that when the object is created. We should also warn if a deprecated tag value is picked, though I'm a little worried that might cause problems with version skew when used with older GCC releases - but perhaps tsktsk is good enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
