https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29764
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #3) Hi Christophe, > It seems your patch does the trick, but I imagined we'd want a more general > solution (that is, do we want add such an optional prefix in all targets)? Oh it is supported for all targets, but only when the default cpu scan() function is used. (See bfd/archures.c:bfd_default_scan). If the architecture provides its own scan function, then this needs to support the <arch>:<machine> syntax in order for it to work. (The AArch64 and ARM architectures being obvious culprits in this case). > That being said, doesn't adding such a prefix require updating some piece of > documentation? Yes - you are right. We should update the documentation as well. Do you want to update the patch or shall I ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
