https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30448
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The problem is an access violation at startup, deep in the guts of the DLL > loader. Doing a debug session with Visual Studio and looking at registers > and memory locations, it was determined that loading the DLL in question is > where things went south. For a DLL generated by GNAT? Which version of GNAT is that? > And, for what it's worth, perhaps --disable-reloc-section is not a good name > for an option - the DLL I produced with that option does have a .reloc > section. So what exactly does --disable-reloc-section mean if specifying > that option still results in a DLL with a .reloc section? So it generates a different .reloc section? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
